Sanford/Fairview merger plan criticized, praised at Minnesota meeting

ST. PAUL — A huge merger proposed for Sanford Health and Fairview Health Services ran into public criticism in the first of several meetings led by Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison in St. Paul.

The two health systems in November announced yet another attempt to combine.

Ellison said his office is conducting its own investigation into the merger plan, along with taking public comment, and expects to make a decision sometime around the end of the month on whether to intervene.

“We're going to test it for its compliance with antitrust laws, test it for its compliance with the charities laws. And then we're just going to ask ourselves, is it good for Minnesota?” he said.

Speaking at the standing-room-only event Tuesday, Jan. 10, James Hereford, president and CEO of Fairview Health Services, said the past few years have tested the health care sector and that the merger will allow the two organizations to better invest in patient care.

“We believe that together, we can improve the experience for both patients and providers in a way that neither organization can do alone. Joining forces with Sanford is a proactive, bold change that will ensure we can continue to provide care for Minnesotans for decades to come,” he said.

But a majority of attendees raised concerns about the plan. One of the key issues is how a merger would impact the University of Minnesota Medical Center, which is operated by Fairview.

Sanford officials said the university would be given the option to repurchase the academic medical center from the combined system. Dean of the medical school Jakub Tolar said the merger should not move forward until these issues are resolved.

”Sanford and Fairview developed their proposed business merger without involving the university. We are not a party to the planning of this merger, so we cannot provide assurance to you and the public, that the public purpose will be fulfilled,” Tolar told Ellison.

Many of the concerns seemed to stem from the lack of concrete information about the proposed merger, including if a combined system of Sanford and Fairview would continue to support and provide reproductive health care and gender-affirming care.

While Sanford Health officials said they would continue to support this type of care, Dr. Cresta Jones, who works with high-risk pregnancies that sometimes require abortion care at the University of Minnesota Medical Center, wants a formal commitment from Sanford leadership to support abortion access within its system.

“I am worried that if we don’t have a formalized commitment, we will lose or have it chipped away at access to safe and effective reproductive health in the state,” Jones said, “and that will compromise my patients’ care.”

Others at the hearing questioned Sanford’s commitment to racial equity and reducing disparities within health care.

Rebekah Fineday, Native American community advocate at Sanford in Bemidji, Minnesota, says the company provides better care, particularly for Indigenous Minnesotans.

“Growing up on the reservation and utilized both Indian Health Services and what was previously MeritCare, then North Country Regional Hospital and now Sanford Health, I have witnessed improved changes,” she said.

Additionally, members of the Minnesota Nurses’ Association questioned if Sanford Health would honor their recently agreed-upon union contract. Representatives from the health care systems say they plan to honor and respect bargaining agreements.

Nurse Sandie Anderson, who works at M Health Fairview St. John’s Hospital, says she’s still skeptical after what unfolded during the early stages of the negotiations.

“Our negotiating teams were meeting with leadership since last March, before our contracts expired in June, we heard about the merger acquisition by the newspaper,” she said, adding she worries the post-merger company would not recognize the union.

Several other public hearings are scheduled across the state throughout January.